-
(/)
| boselena
: 95
2013 .
: 51
| Stalker88 : [q] ! , ? , , , 2023 . , 4 .[/q]
! . . . . . . ---
, , , | | |
sg59  - : 997 2018 . : 1415 | boselena : [q] .[/q]
. . , , . , / , , / , . , . ---
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , | | (3) |
| veramiller1
: 387
2010 .
: 205 | - .796? 6 1910 . ( 1807). , - ? . | | |
| boselena
: 95
2013 .
: 51
| #
27 2024 22:34 27 2024 22:35 veramiller1 : [q] - .796? 6 1910 . ( 1807). , - ? .[/q]
. , . ( 2023) .796. . . . ---
, , , | | (1) |
Irina Ol  - : 5436 2009 . : 17137 | ---
, . | | (3) |
| veramiller1
: 387
2010 .
: 205 | Irina Ol : [q]
veramiller1 wrote:
[q]
My great-grandfather received a divorce on February 6, 1910 (No. 1807).
[/q]
In addition to the date and number, it should be written whose decision of 1910 it was - the Synod, the Provincial Spiritual Consistory or the Provincial Court.
In 1910, not all divorce cases reached the Synod.
In the Synod archive in the 20th century, most divorce cases were destroyed.
If you want, look for the case in the inventory for 1910 ( inventory 191, divorce cases - section III table 2 ) https://fgurgia.ru/imageViewer...qNlp6Tws4=[/q]
. III 2? | | |
. -, .
: 16445
2010 .
: 28913 | veramiller1 : [q] III 2?[/q]
470 ( 473). | | (3) |
| Friede
: 266
2004 .
: 254 | ,,, 1837 .?
 ---
,.
,, .
.
| | |
Irina Ol - : 5436 2009 . : 17137 | #
30 2024 20:03 30 2024 20:46 ---
, . | | (5) |
|
